![]() |
Grappig!
Bill Gates zei onlangs: "Als General Motors net zo boven op de techniek had gezeten als de computerindustrie, zouden we nu allemaal in auto's rijden die $25 kosten en 250 km rijden op een liter brandstof." Dat kon GM natuurlijk niet over haar kant laten gaan. Het antwoord (in een persbericht) was vernietigend. "Als GM op dezelfde manier met technologie omging als Microsoft, dan:
1. zou uw auto er minstens twee keer per dag zonder aanwijsbare reden mee ophouden. U zou dit gewoon accepteren, de auto herstarten en verder rijden. 2. zou u elke keer als de verkeerstekens vernieuwd werden, een nieuwe auto moeten kopen. 3. zouden alle meters vervangen kunnen worden door een display, met daarop twee woorden: algemene fout 4. zou Apple een auto maken die op zonne-energie liep, vijf keer zo snel was en drie keer zou eenvoudig te bedienen, maar slechts op 5% van de wegen worden toegelaten. 5. zou de airbag eerst vragen: 'weet u het zeker?' voor 'ie afging. 6. zou u bij een GM-auto ook alle wegenkaarten van een bepaald merk moeten kopen, of u dat nu wel of niet wilde of nodig had. Als u zonder deze kaarten zou willen rijden, leverde de auto maar 25% van de normale prestaties. 7. zou maar een persoon tegelijk in de auto kunnen rijden, tenzij hij Car95 of CarNT heeft. De zitplaatsen moeten nog wel apart worden aangeschaft. 8. zou je bij elke GM-auto opnieuw moeten leren autorijden, omdat niets op dezelfde manier functioneert. en de topper: 9. zou je op de 'Start'-knop moeten drukken om de motor af te zetten LoL!!!!! http://forum.scholieren.com/biggrin.gif |
Oud, maar wel http://forum.scholieren.com/cool.gif
|
|
hoe lang geleden is onlangs
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Tis niet waargebeurd overigens. |
maken we er weer een officieel moppen topic van? http://forum.scholieren.com/biggrin.gif
|
Citaat:
|
UPGRADE WARNING:
Be aware of the following software problems before purchasing: Last year a friend of mine upgraded GirlFriend 1.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources for other applications. He is only now noticing that Wife 1.0 also is spawning Child-Processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the product brochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application. Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself such that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. He's finding that some applications such as PokerNight 10.3, PubNight 2.5, and CigarBar 7.0 are no longer able to run in the system at all, crashing the system when selected (even though they always worked fine before). At installation, Wife 1.0 provides no option as to the installation of undesired Plug-Ins such as MotherInLaw 55.8 and SisterInLaw Beta release. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day. The features he'd like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0 include: * Minimize button * An install shield feature that allows Wife 2.0 to be installed with the option to uninstall at anytime without the loss of cache and other system resources. * An option to run the network driver in promiscuous mode which would allow the systems hardware probe feature to be much more useful. I myself decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 2.0. Even here, however, I found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 2.0 on top of Girlfriend 1.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 1.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug which I should have been aware of. Apparently the versions of Girlfriend have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. (You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now.) To make matters worse, the uninstall program for Girlfriend 1.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another thing that sucks: all versions of Girlfriend continually pop-up little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0 BUG WARNING Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources. BUG WORK-AROUNDS To avoid the above bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and never run any file transfer applications such as LapLink 6.0. Also, beware of similar shareware applications that have been known to carry viruses that may affect Wife 1.0. Another solution would be to run Mistress 1.1 via a UseNet provider under an anonymous name. Here again, beware of the viruses which can accidentally be downloaded from the UseNet |
Citaat:
|
die van durex kende ik nog niet en is cool
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
|
Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 03:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.