Scholieren.com forum

Scholieren.com forum (https://forum.scholieren.com/index.php)
-   Onzin (https://forum.scholieren.com/forumdisplay.php?f=49)
-   -   Deadpool (https://forum.scholieren.com/showthread.php?t=1912139)

Macrador 18-02-2016 21:15

Deadpool
 
Was leuk.

Sortjuh 18-02-2016 23:38

(Y)

Not for Sale 19-02-2016 00:04

Ik ga over twee uur!

Haubenmeise 19-02-2016 12:02

Wat is het?

deadlock 19-02-2016 12:13

Slechts de meest besproken film van 2016 so far maar ach.

Carn 19-02-2016 12:28

James Gunn had wel een aardig betoog trouwens:

Citaat:

"The film has a self-deprecating tone that’s riotous. It’s never been done before. It’s poking fun at Marvel. That label takes itself so seriously, can you imagine them making fun of themselves in a movie? They’d rather stab themselves."

That's a quote from Deadline Hollywood, attributing it to a Hollywood "suit." I love Deadline and get a lot of my film business news from them. And I love Deadpool even more - the film is hilariously funny, has lots of heart, and is exactly what we need right now, taking true risks in spectacle film - but COME THE FUCK ON. That's no reason to rewrite history. This quote has to have been said by the dumbest fucking Hollywood exec in the history of dumb fucking Hollywood execs.

Let's ignore Guardians for a moment, a movie that survives from moment to moment building itself up and cutting itself down - God knows I'm biased about that one. But what do you think Favreau and Downey did in Iron Man? What the fuck was Ant-Man??!

Come on, Deadline.

After every movie smashes records people here in Hollywood love to throw out the definitive reasons why the movie was a hit. I saw it happen with Guardians. It "wasn't afraid to be fun" or it "was colorful and funny" etc etc etc. And next thing I know I hear of a hundred film projects being set up "like Guardians," and I start seeing dozens of trailers exactly like the Guardians trailer with a big pop song and a bunch of quips. Ugh.
Ugh. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.

Deadpool wasn't that. Deadpool was its own thing. THAT'S what people are reacting to. It's original, it's damn good, it was made with love by the filmmakers, and it wasn't afraid to take risks.

For the theatrical experience to survive, spectacle films need to expand their definition of what they can be. They need to be unique and true voices of the filmmakers behind them. They can't just be copying what came before them.

So, over the next few months, if you pay attention to the trades, you'll see Hollywood misunderstanding the lesson they should be learning with Deadpool. They'll be green lighting films "like Deadpool" - but, by that, they won't mean "good and original" but "a raunchy superhero film" or "it breaks the fourth wall." They'll treat you like you're stupid, which is the one thing Deadpool didn't do.

But hopefully in the midst of all this there will be a studio or two that will take the right lesson from this - like Fox did with Guardians by green-lighting Deadpool - and say - "Boy, maybe we can give them something they don't already have."

And that's who is going to succeed.

Have a great day.

Vlerkje 19-02-2016 12:39

Ik wil 'm ook zien. (Y)

Haubenmeise 19-02-2016 15:45

Citaat:

deadlock schreef: (Bericht 34028852)
Slechts de meest besproken film van 2016 so far maar ach.

Het jaar is nog jong!

Ik heb net nog even op Wikipedia gekeken en ik geloof ook niet dat ik geïnteresseerd ben.

WolterB 19-02-2016 16:11

De film is dan ook Engels gesproken.

deadlock 19-02-2016 16:40

Citaat:

WolterB schreef: (Bericht 34028981)
De film is dan ook Engels gesproken.

Minderwaardige zaadtaal inderdaad :bob:

Schrödinger 19-02-2016 16:45

Citaat:

WolterB schreef: (Bericht 34028981)
De film is dan ook Engels gesproken.

:D

Miekje* 19-02-2016 16:47

Hij lijkt me best leuk, maar niet iets om voor naar de bios te gaan.

Haubenmeise 19-02-2016 17:04

Citaat:

WolterB schreef: (Bericht 34028981)
De film is dan ook Engels gesproken.

Oh, ik kijk best nog weleens wat dat Engels gesproken is hoor.

Haubenmeise 19-02-2016 17:43

Dit genre interesseert me gewoon niet.

Mr Soija 19-02-2016 20:36

Lijkt me hartstikke leuk.

Macrador 19-02-2016 20:44

Citaat:

Miekje* schreef: (Bericht 34028996)
Hij lijkt me best leuk, maar niet iets om voor naar de bios te gaan.

Leuker dan alle stomme romcoms die in de cinema spelen.

Schrödinger 19-02-2016 21:22

Citaat:

Macrador schreef: (Bericht 34029143)
Leuker dan alle stomme romcoms die in de cinema spelen.

Ook leuker dan poep eten.

Carn 20-02-2016 00:24

Citaat:

Haubenmeise schreef: (Bericht 34029020)
Dit genre interesseert me gewoon niet.

Humor en zelfreflectie? Is ook een lastig genre.

Haubenmeise 20-02-2016 07:05

Citaat:

Carn schreef: (Bericht 34029236)
Humor en zelfreflectie? Is ook een lastig genre.

:D

spawn again 20-02-2016 08:40

Wat interesseert je dan wel?

Haubenmeise 20-02-2016 08:51

Citaat:

spawn again schreef: (Bericht 34029326)
Wat interesseert je dan wel?

Een heleboel andere dingen.

Miekje* 20-02-2016 10:04

Citaat:

Macrador schreef: (Bericht 34029143)
Leuker dan alle stomme romcoms die in de cinema spelen.

Die kijk ik überhaupt niet vrijwillig :p

ßuerp 21-02-2016 01:23

Imax :no

Moet hiervoor dus naar Skiffa.

claret 22-02-2016 22:55

Deadlock

ßuerp 06-03-2016 20:10

Geweldige film. :cool:

'I'he Prophet 07-03-2016 00:54

I had the Liam Neeson nightmare.


Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 21:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.