Wie kan me engelse argumenten nakijken

[miszz_immi]

Heey, ik heb binnenkort een discussie voor engels over roken.
Ik heb een aantal tegenargumenten in het engels.
Wie zou ze voor me kunnen nakijken?!
Vriendelijk bedankt!

[Kitten]

miszz_immi schreef:

Heey, ik heb binnenkort een discussie voor engels over roken.
Ik heb een aantal tegenargumenten in het engels.
Wie zou ze voor me kunnen nakijken?!
Vriendelijk bedankt!

Als je ze levert... dan wil ik er best even naar kijken.

[miszz_immi]

Kitten schreef:

Als je ze levert... dan wil ik er best even naar kijken.

oow dank je wel zal even me argumenten plaatsen.

[miszz_immi]

Complete smoke prohibition in hotels and catering industry will cost minimum 50,000 job to the line. Especially, discotheques and bars will be found. That says the Netherlands to royal hotel and catering industry (KHN).

In Ireland the national turnover fall in the hotel and catering industry between the 15-18% is, on the country up to 40%. 7000 people have lost their job and 500 pubs have closed the door. (The Economic Times, nevertheless a reliable quality newspaper.)

Moreover, it is annoying if you are with someone, and you most been go outside to smoke.

A smoke prohibition is not necessary; it is also possible to make a special place where you can smoke.

Modern suction equipment ensures that people no charge have when someone smoke a cigarette, because all smoke is absorbed by very good filter systems. From research of Health, Welfare and Sport becomes clear that good ventilation clears the air more than 99 percent.


It is very difficult to check the smoke prohibition. Moreover, where you want to lay down the responsibility? If a customer a cigarette puts up, which there is then responsible? The customer or the bar boss?

A smoke prohibition leads under the customers to aggression. From a research under members of the FNV allies becomes clear that 36% have experienced it already once those smokers react aggressively to a smoke prohibition. That makes it thus still dangerous for employees and other customers.

[Geel]

miszz_immi schreef:

Complete smoke prohibition in hotels and catering industry will lead to a loss of at least 50,000 jobs to the line. Especially discotheques and bars will be hit. That says the KHN

In Ireland the national turnover fall in the hotel and catering industry is between 15-18%, on the country up to 40%. 7000 people have lost their job and 500 pubs have closed the door. (The Economic Times, nevertheless a reliable quality newspaper.)

Moreover, it is annoying if you are with someone, and you must go outside to smoke.

A smoke prohibition is not necessary; it is also possible to make a special area where you can smoke.

Modern air filtering devices ensures that people have no charge when someone smokes a cigarette, because all the smoke is absorbed by very good filter systems. According to a research of the Health, Welfare and sport ministry good air filtering devices can clear the air for more than 99 percent.


It is very difficult to control the smoke prohibition. Moreover, who has to take the repsonibility? If a customer lits a cigarette, whose responsibility is it then? The customer's or the bar owner's?

A smoke prohibition leads to aggression under the customers. From a research amongst the members of the FNV, it becomes clear that 36% of the members have come across a situation where the custumers reacts violent. This makes it dangerous for employees and other customers.

[June bug]

Volgens mij is dat 'charge' gewoon letterlijk vertaald van het woordje last.
@ ts: Zo werkt dat dus niet, je kunt van die zin beter dit maken: Modern air filtering devices ensure (geen S hier want meervoud) that people aren't bothered by the smoke of someone's cigarette, because...

[June bug]

Hm ik zie nu dat er nog veel meer fouten instaan, komt ie dan: (ik copy paste nu ggcy8 zijn verbetering)

Complete smoke prohibition in hotels and catering industry will lead to a loss of at least 50,000 jobs to the line. Especially discotheques and bars will be hit. That says the KHN. (punt)

In Ireland the national turnover fall in the hotel and catering industry is between 15-18%, on (dit is niet het juiste voorzetsel, weet ook niet wat je precies met de zin bedoelt dus geen idee wat het wel moet zijn.) the country up to 40%. 7000 people have lost their jobs and 500 pubs have closed their doors. (The Economic Times, nevertheless a reliable quality newspaper.)

Moreover, it is annoying if you are with someone, and you have to go outside to smoke.

A smoke prohibition is not necessary; it is also possible to make a special area where you can smoke.

Modern air filtering devices ensure (geen s want 3e persoon meervoud) that people aren't bothered by the smoke of someone's cigarette, because all the smoke is absorbed by very good filter systems. According to a research of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (sports dan ook met een hoofdletter en met een S erachter) good air filtering devices can clear the air for more than 99 per cent (per cent moet met een spatie er tussen).

It is very difficult to control the smoke prohibition. Moreover, who has to take responsibility (geen 'the', en responsibility was fout geschreven)? If a customer lights (lit is de verleden tijd, het is to light, lit, lit) a cigarette, whose responsibility is it then? The customer's or the bar owner's?

A smoke prohibition leads to aggression amongst (under is letterlijk vanuit het Nederlands vertaald) the customers. From a research amongst the members of the FNV, it becomes clear that 36% of the members have come across a situation where the customers react (geen s, 3e persoon meervoud) violently (moet een bijwoord zijn omdat het terugslaat op het werkwoord to react). This makes it dangerous for employees and other customers.

Zo zou hij moeten kloppen.

[Geel]

@June Bug:

Zo klopt het volgens mij ook. Je kan zien dat jij er meer tijd aan hebt besteed dan ik .