29-07-2006, 23:24
|
||
|
Citaat:
|
|
| Advertentie | |
|
|
|
|
29-07-2006, 23:28
|
|
|
|
Uit Hezbollahs programma (1985):
The Necessity for the Destruction of Israel We see in Israel the vanguard of the United States in our Islamic world. It is the hated enemy that must be fought until the hated ones get what they deserve. This enemy is the greatest danger to our future generations and to the destiny of our lands, particularly as it glorifies the ideas of settlement and expansion, initiated in Palestine, and yearning outward to the extension of the Great Israel, from the Euphrates to the Nile. Our primary assumption in our fight against Israel states that the Zionist entity is aggressive from its inception, and built on lands wrested from their owners, at the expense of the rights of the Muslim people. Therefore our struggle will end only when this entity is obliterated. We recognize no treaty with it, no cease fire, and no peace agreements, whether separate or consolidated. We vigorously condemn all plans for negotiation with Israel, and regard all negotiators as enemies, for the reason that such negotiation is nothing but the recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist occupation of Palestine. Therefore we oppose and reject the Camp David Agreements, the proposals of King Fahd, the Fez and Reagan plan, Brezhnev's and the French-Egyptian proposals, and all other programs that include the recognition (even the implied recognition) of the Zionist entity." En dan: Nasrallah: Israel temporary country Roee Nahmias (...) The sheikh referred to Israel as a “temporary country. “Israel was established as a military state; the army was not established as an army of a country,” he said. (...) “So far the enemy has only suffered military defeats, as was the case with the most important of its three Navy vessels off the Lebanese coast – which was struck. This was also the case during the ground war, when elite Golani Brigade forces were defeated,” he said. “You can see the amount of damage we have caused them in photos showing soldiers evacuated on stretchers lying on their stomach because they were shot in the back while trying to escape. The most important loss of the enemy relates to the morale of its leadership and army, as the army is incapable of overcoming a small organization with a strong belief in its cause." The Hizbullah chief added: “(Vice Premier Shimon) Peres said ‘this is a life or death war for Israel,’ and he is right because he knows that if the resistance will come out triumphant this time the Zionist entity will not have a future. When the (Israeli) nation will begin to lose faith in its army it will mark the beginning of the end for this entity.” (...) http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...283155,00.html -------- T.a.v. het onderstreepte: het is wel zeer toevallig allemaal dat de kidnappings rond het tekenen van het gevangenendocument door de politieke tak van de Hamas gebeurde. Laatst gewijzigd op 29-07-2006 om 23:31. |
|
29-07-2006, 23:52
|
|
|
|
sick
Akko: Arab MK, sister attacked by 3 Jews Abas Zkoor claims ‘three crazy drunkards’ chased after his sister yelling ‘Arab, Nasrallah should kill you’ and tried to stab her; MK lightly injured by knife while trying to protect her Roee Nahmias MK Abas Zkoor (United Arab List-Ta'al), who lives in Akko, claimed that he and his sister, who wears traditional Muslim attire, were attacked with a knife by a group of young Jews in the city. Zkoor, who was lightly injured in his hand as he was stabbed by one of the assailants while trying to protect his sister, filed a complaint with the police. "A couple of crazy drunkards chased after my sister and said to her ‘Arab, Nasrallah should kill you’. She ran away, but they chased after her, caught her and began to beat her. One of them took out a knife and tried to stab her. When I heard the screams, I arrived at the scene, and then they started to curse me. They wounded my finger, and my friend's ear," Zkoor told Ynet. Akko police said three suspects were apprehended, adding that Zkoor was not attacked because of his MK status. According to Zkoor, a young Arab man who happened to pass by prevented the assailants from stabbing his sister. The MK said he yelled at one of the assailants “aren’t you ashamed to attack a woman?” In 2003 a bomb exploded beneath the car of Arab MK Isam Makhoul in Haifa. Haifa residents Eliran Golan and Alex Rabinovich were accused of plotting the attack; Golan later committed suicide. A number of young Arabs began to gather at the scene and shortly thereafter police arrived and arrested the three assailants. “One of the youngsters was injured in his ear and was evacuated to a Nahariya hospital,” Zkoor said. The Arab MK and his sister claim the attack was nationalistically-motivated. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...283237,00.html |
|
29-07-2006, 23:53
|
|
|
|
Ik ben benieuwd,...........maar ik betwijfel dat de soldaten vrijgelaten zullen worden.
France, Lebanon to deploy to border with Israel Ronny Sofer France and the Lebanese army will take part in the multinational peacekeeping force expected to take position along the southern Lebanese border, it was revealed following a meeting between US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem. The two met at the Prime Minister’s official residence in Jerusalem late Saturday night for nearly two hours, most of which was spent in one-on-one talks. US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs C. David Welch, National Security Council Director for Near East and North African Affairs Elliot Abrams, Olmert’s chief-of-staff Dr. Yoram Turbovitz, his diplomatic advisor Shalom Turgeman, and his military adviser Maj.-Gen. Gadi Shamni also took part in some of the talks. The meeting was reportedly held in a cordial atmosphere, and between the diplomatic deliberations, Rice and Olmert took dinner together. Olmert’s office said that during the entire meeting, Rice did not at all press the issue of a ceasefire. The two leaders also agreed that any diplomatic arrangement to end the fighting would be dependent on the release of kidnapped IDF soldiers Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev. Regarding the establishment of a multinational peacekeeping force, the conditions for its establishment, the length of its mandate and its responsibilities were not yet finalized, although Rice expressed optimism that it would be set up very soon. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...283247,00.html |
|
30-07-2006, 10:22
|
|
|
|
Olmert: Qana used for launching rockets
Ronny Sofer In a first reference to the Israel Air Force strike in the southern Lebanese village of Qana, which killed at least 55 people, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told his ministers on Sunday that "from reports I have received, the village of Qana was used as a center for launching rockets at Kiryat Shmona and Afula." "Hundreds of rockets have been fired from the village's surroundings and dozens have been fired from inside the village," he added. Olmert was briefed on the serious incident by his military secretary Gad Shmani. Injured evacuated (Video: Reuters) "All the residents were warned and called to leave. There are hiding places for rockets inside the village, and the village itself constitutes a shelter for rocket launchers," the prime minister revealed. He added that "no one gave an instruction to fire on civilians, and this doesn’t mean that any of us gave an order to fire at civilians. We have no policy of killing innocent civilians. For 18 days hundreds and thousands of missiles have been fired, aimed at murdering innocent civilians in the north." http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...283448,00.html Lebanon: Dozens killed in IDF strike Ali Waked Dozens hurt in southern Lebanon: At least 55 people, including 21 children, were killed after a three-story building collapsed in the village of Qana in southern Lebanon. Lebanese media reported that the building, which serves as a shelter for refugees from southern Lebanon, was hit in an Israel Air Force air strike. A senior IAF officer said that the Air Force has been striking the area for three days now following dozens of incidents in which Katyusha rockets were launched from the village and its surrounding areas, and that residents were warned to leave. Defense Minister Amir Peretz instructed the Israel Defense Forces to launch an immediate inquiry into the incident in Qana. The officer explained that "also yesterday (Saturday) rockets were launched at Kiryat Shmona, Ma'a lot, Afula and other areas. We are only striking areas from which rockets are being fired, and the building struck this morning was close to an area where there was an attempt to launch Katyusha at Israel." "On a regular basis terrorists tend to run dozens of meters into the building, sometimes with the launchers themselves, and hide there," he said. According to the officer, the IDF issued a severe warning to the village residents, as well as to residents of other villages in the area, that they must leave the place due to the activities of terrorists in the area and the fact that fact that the IDF was operating there. "We followed the operation regime in the village and it seemed abandoned by civilians, so the strikes are carried out there, not against the village itself but against the terror centers," he said. The officer noted that terrorists may be insisting to operate from the village in light of the fact that it symbols an incident that took place there at the midst of Operation Grapes of Wrath, in which dozens of Lebanese civilians were killed and which was one of the main causes which led to the end of the operation. 'Dozens buried under rubble' On Sunday morning, shortly after 8 a.m., a report was received on the building collapse. Sources in Lebanon claimed that the Israel Air Force struck in the area and destroyed several buildings, and as a result many people were trapped in a three-story building. Similar to the incident which took place in Qana during Operation Grapes of Wrath, the building hit on Sunday was also used as a shelter by refugees from southern Lebanon who escaped the Israel Defense Forces' strikes. According to reports, some 100 refugees were in the building at the time of the strike. The al-Jazeera television network and the Lebanese and Arab stations reported that 35 people were killed, many of them buried under the rubble. The Lebanese noted that rescue forces were experiencing difficulties due to the great wreckage in the area. Lebanese rescue services and Red Cross members were operating to complete the evacuation. According to eyewitnesses, many people were searching for survivors with bare hands, while bodies of children lay in the area and many injured were crying for help. One of the survivors searched for his sister who was buried inside the building, while the body of a 70-year-old woman and a small baby were recovered from the ruins. The Lebanese Health Ministry reported that 403 civilians were killed so far in southern Lebanon, and the death toll continues to rise. Sources at the United Nations reported that the numbers were much higher, possibly close to 600. The official reports came from police and hospital sources, but according to sources in the UN's aid organizations, the police and health services in many areas in Lebanon have stopped operating, with police officers escaping and hospitals shut down. Qana – end of Operation Grapes of Wrath In 1996, during Operation Grapes of Wrath, the IDF shot an artillery shell at fire sources in the village of Qana in southern Lebanon. The shell hit a UN outpost in the village, which was functioning at the time as a shelter for residents of the village. The shell caused the death of over 100 Lebanese civilians and the injury of tens more village residents. The results of the shelling disaster realized the Israeli fear of international pressure. Pictures of the dead and injured were broadcast throughout the world, giving birth to intense international pressure on Israel to end the operation even though its objectives were not yet achieved. A short time before the events of Qana, the UN initiated an US-led mediation process between Israel and Syrian and Lebanese representatives (who acted in coordination with Hizbullah). After a number of days of negotiations, the representatives signed an agreement called Understandings of Grapes of Wrath (4.26.1996), in which the two sides committed not to involved civilians in war. Practically, it was agreed that Hizbullah would abstain from firing Katyusha rockets at Israel, and that the IDF would abstain from shooting at civilian targets in southern Lebanon. Likewise, it was agreed upon to establishment of a follow-up committee, in which the United States, France, Syria, Lebanon, and Israel would participate, that would oversee the application of the understandings. One possible interpretation of the agreement is that Israel recognized Hizbullah's right to strike IDF soldiers in the security buffer zone. Fighting approaches Syrian border On Saturday night, the Air Force continued to strike targets across southern Lebanon. Among the 40 targets attacked were also Hizbullah buildings, bridges, a rocket launcher and access routes. The Air Force also struck near the border between Syria and Lebanon, in the Bekaa Valley area, security forces in Lebanon reported. It was the first strike in the area in 18 years. IAF aircrafts launched three missiles at the Masana crossing, which is 300 meters (984 feet) away from the Lebanese customs area. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...283311,00.html  Deja vu 1996
Laatst gewijzigd op 30-07-2006 om 10:26. |
|
30-07-2006, 10:38
|
||||
|
|
Citaat:
In Palestina verliep dat heel anders. Rond 1880 had je 450.000 arabieren tegenover 25.000 joden. Tussen 1880 en 1940 is dit gestegen naar 600.000 joden "tegenover" 1 miljoen arabieren. Joden kochten land en begonnen ook daadwerkelijk land te besturen. Zie je het verschil? Je zegt hetzelf dat Nederlanders al de nodige angst hadden, laatstaan Arabieren kijkende naar het bovengenoemde scenario. Dat ze aggresiever reageerde dan de nederlanders lijkt mij volslagen logisch. Immers leek het meer op een bezetting van joden, wat het misschien ook ergens was, echter hadden de joden daarin niet zoveel schuld destijds. In een latur stadium bleek wel dat ze zich ook als bezetter gingen gedragen (kolonisten). Ik denk dat zelfs wij nederlanders met het klein beetje nationalisme dat we hebben geweldadig zouden reageren als een andere bevolkingsgroep in korte tijd massaal (dus verhoudingen worden in 1 keer 60% 40%) naar Nederland toestroomt en ook daadwerkelijk macht vergaart. Dat geldt denkt ik overigens voor elk land. Maar ik ben het ermee eens dat er geen onschuldigen meer bestaan in het conflict. Citaat:
Dan is er nog een verschil Hezbollah en Hamas zijn zoiezo kleinere organisaties, ze vertegenwoordigen niet alle palestijnen of libanezen. Als we het dus hebben over "uitkomst accepteren" zullen mensen worden benadeeld (libanezen die bv niet Hezbollah steunen) die eigenlijk niks van doen hebben met het conflict. Citaat:
|
|||
|
30-07-2006, 10:40
|
||
Verwijderd
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 10:44
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 10:46
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
Net zoals Wilders dat bij het NLs publiek tracht te doen, zeg maar 
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 10:55
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 10:57
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
2. wat bedoel je precies met "als een bezetter te gedragen"? |
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:07
|
||||||
|
|
Verontrustend:
Foreboding "The Sandmonkey" I just received word that things in Lebanon are, getting, ehh, a little secterian. There was stories of Shia refugees in a druze beighbourhood that tore up Walid Jumbalatt's pictures and posters that were hanging on the walls. There was another story of a Christian supermarkets refusing to sell groceries to Shia regugees, saying that they are saving it for the christians. I recalled a post that I read at Mustapha's blog the nother day, where the Shia regugees booed and heckled the FPM sunni youth while it was bringing them food and supplies, and I started to get slightly alarmed. The Lebanese are currently united behind Hezbollah because they want the israeli shelling to stop, and the only people who are doing something about it are Hezbollah. But the moment ba cease fire takes place this could all change. I am more afraid of lebanse civil war than I am of what is going on right now, and I think many lebanese people would share my view. The Lebanese fabric maybe united right now, but it's secterian. And while I said that any civil war would be won by the Shia at this point, it doesn't mean it would be a pleasant victory, or that it would stop the other lebanese sects from fighting it. All it would take, for it all to go to hell, is for someone to do something stupid, someone else to retaliate, and mob rule will take over. However, since I didn't want to be the lil monkey who cried civil war, I figured I would cruise around the lebanese blogs to see if the stories I've heard were isoalted incidents, or if there is a larger pattern taking shape here. I basically wanted them to comfort me that what's happening right now is the worst that Lebanon will have to endure. After reading a couple of them, such comfort now seems lacking. Here are a few examples: This is a picture posted on Michael Totten's blog. It's of a christian mob attacking a car the otehr day for having a Support Hezbollah sticker on them:  There are the reports of Hezbollah firing their rockets from the Ain Ebel Village, which is christian, against its people's will: Citaat:
Citaat:
Citaat:
Citaat:
Citaat:
You know, I am not the praying kind, but I might start praying for Lebanon right about now. I think you should too. |
|||||
|
30-07-2006, 11:09
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
Maakt niet uit al gaat het om een centimeter. Het gaat om het principe, wel degelijk reden om je zorgen te gaan maken als "jou" land word ingepikt lijkt me zo. Maar ook dat joden zich als landbestuurder begonnen te gedragen inplaats van landeigenaar, nog voor dat de staat Israel was opgericht. Ze hadden nog voor de oprichting van Israel eigenlijk al volledig een eigen "staatje" binnen de staat Palestina, niet officieel maar officieus wel. (eigen instuten, medische voorzieningen, eigen regels etc etc). Wat uiteraard wel het gevolg was van de tweedeling die onstond in Palestina, maar goed die tweedeling was er eigenlijk vanaf die immigratiegolf. |
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:16
|
||
|
Citaat:
En let me guess: de rest van de wereld houdt netjes zijn mond dicht lafaards!
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:20
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:21
|
|
|
Alsof er niets beters te doen is...
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:26
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:26
|
|||
|
Citaat:
Ook met die uitrusting viel het wel mee. Totdat Tjechoslowakije besloot om een aantal Messerschidts te doneren (ironisch; die toestellen waren nog door de nazi's ontworpen en gebouwd) was er geen Israëlische luchtmacht. Ik moet zeggen dat ik voor het feit dat zo'n minderheid verschillende gecombineerde legers de baas kon best bewondering heb. Tegenwoordig ligt dat anders, omdat ze gewonnen hebben en nu een gevestigd land zijn. De reden dat de Hamas en Hezbollah niet mogen bewapenen is dat ze geen verzets- maar een terreurorganisatie zijn. In de handvesten van beiden staat niet dat ze een oplossing willen of een eigen staat willen, er staat dat ze Israël, iedereen erin en eraan willen vernietigen. De PLO mag dan weer wel haar eigen troepen onderhouden omdat die het Palestijnse gezag (zouden moeten) zijn. Citaat:
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
||
|
30-07-2006, 11:26
|
||
Verwijderd
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:27
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
Honderdduizenden Israëliërs gevlucht JERUZALEM - Ongeveer 330.000 Israëliërs zijn in de afgelopen weken gevlucht voor de raketaanvallen van Hezbollah vanuit Libanon.  Een politieman draagt een gewond Israëlisch meisje naar een ambulance na een rakentaanval van Hezbollah. Foto EPA Het gaat om inwoners uit het noorden van Israël. Dat heeft een woordvoerder van het Israëlische ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken zondag laten weten. De woordvoerder zei dat de raketaanvallen het leven van ongeveer een miljoen inwoners van het noorden van Israël beïnvloeden. "Een derde van hen is vertrokken", aldus de zegsman. http://www.ad.nl/buitenland/article506267.ece
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:28
|
|
|
|
More to Lebanon war than meets the eye
7/30/2006 7:48:00 AM GMT By: Ramzy Baroud At first glance, history seems to repeat itself in Lebanon, where a lengthy cold war is intermittently interrupted by an extreme show of violence as traditional players quickly sprint into action, stacking their support behind one party or the other. News headlines remind us of past conflicts such as that of 1978 – when Israel illegally occupied parts of Lebanon – and 1982 – when Israel unleashed a full scale invasion and most deadly campaign against its small neighbor to the north, killing tens of thousands, mostly civilians. But the unreserved significance of the ongoing conflict has more to do with Israel's military ambitions – not necessarily colonial, but rather strategic - than with Hezbollah's ability to strike deep into Israel. Let's examine the bigger picture, starting well before Hezbollah's daring capture of two Israeli soldiers in cross border fighting, which unfortunately, at least as far the media is concerned, is the solitary provocation that sparked the current conflict. (A San Francisco Chronicle investigative report by Matthew Kalman - Israel Set War Plan More Than a Year Ago, July 21, 2006 – sheds more light on Israel's intent to carry a three-week bombardment of Lebanon as early as 2000.) For years, Israel's strategic objective has been to break up the Syria-Lebanon front – to isolate Syria and meddle as always in Lebanon's affairs – while diminishing whatever leverage Iran has in Lebanon through its support of Hezbollah. As I argued in the first chapter of my book: the Second Palestinian Intifada, Israel's military defeat in Lebanon and its army's abrupt exit in May 2000, has espoused what became increasingly known as "the spirit of resistance" among Palestinians and Lebanese alike. Israel has proved once and for all to have serious military shortcomings, and Hezbollah – an organization that was comprised mostly of the relatives of Israel's victims in the invasion of 1982 and subsequent years- was the single entity that exposed those limitations. Thus, Israel upgraded its use of violence to unprecedented degrees during the Palestinian uprising of September 2000 – months after the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon- to send a clear message that their military travesty in Lebanon will not be repeated elsewhere. Moreover, despite its insistence that it left Lebanon for good, Israel never departed from its original military goal of destroying Hezbollah or meddling in Lebanese affairs. Then there was the American attack on Iraq in March 2003 - clearly a highly dangerous military adventure – which was lauded by Israeli and pro-Israeli neo-conservative ideologues in Tel Aviv and in Washington as prudent and indispensable involvement, that would further cement Israel's security and the US strategic objectives in the Middle East – thoughtlessly considered one and the same. The Iraq war was anticipated to be a 'cakewalk', which would be followed – according to various neo-cons documents available on the web – by a regime change in Syria and Iran, respectively. Though both countries have proved unequally vital in the US so-called 'war on terror', Israel views both as imminent and ominous threats, for only these countries, after the collapse of the Iraqi military front, still possess real armies and potential military threats. Of course, such a claim, at least in the Syrian case, is highly questionable. Bogged down in Iraq in an impossible war, it became clear that the US military is simply incapable of taking on more of Israel's foes. According to Israel's friends in the US Congress and media – and they are plentiful – the mission was not accomplished. This explains the growing neo-con intellectual insurgency against the administration, accusing it of 'mishandling' the Iraq conflict and failing to appreciate the gravity of the Iran threat. While President Bush is relentless in his anti Iran and Syria rhetoric, it's becoming more transparent that a full invasion of Iran, or even Syria are now in the realm of wishful thinking. With American military ambitions slowly dying out in the dust of the battlefield in Baghdad and Ramadi, Israel is growing utterly frustrated. Why? On one hand, despite the intense pressure on Syria to abandon Lebanon – as it did – Hezbollah's military and political influence hardly faded, as Israel has hoped for an immediate overhaul of the political map of Lebanon and the dismantling of Hezbollah. Even worse, a movement that is parallel to Hezbollah in many ways in Palestinian and Arab psyche, Hamas, was on the rise, this time – ironically - as part of the US advocated democratic reforms campaign in the Middle East. Hamas’ advent to power in January 2006, was followed by a less decisive Israeli election that brought to power a questionable coalition, whose prime minister and defense minister are known for having no military browses, a major diversion from Israel's traditional politics. In other words, the new Israeli government had a great deal to prove on the battlefield to receive much needed validation at home. Similar to its political pressure on Lebanon and Syria – using Washington as a conduit- Tel Aviv took on Hamas: a suffocating economic siege, an international smear campaign and a diplomatic blockade – using Washington, but also corrupt ex-Palestinian officials to achieve its goals. That too has failed terribly, which prompted military strikes against Gaza, killing scores and wounding hundreds, mostly civilians. In a rare diversion from its political leadership, the Hamas armed wing responded by capturing an Israeli solider at the border, vowing to only release him if all Palestinian women and children in Israeli jails are set free. As far as Israel and the US administration – and much of the Western media – are concerned, Hamas provoked the Israeli military wrath that followed, the killing and wounding of hundreds of innocent people and destroying what it has spared in past onslaughts. While Arab governments carried on with business as usual, Hezbollah – who must've know that an Israeli military campaign against Lebanon was inevitable any way – decided to take the initiative by opening a war front on Israel's northern border in the least comfortable times for the Israeli military, with the hope to relieve some of the pressure on Palestinians. Whether it miscalculated or not is another story. Neither Syria nor Iran asked Hezbollah to start a new war on Israel, though I can imagine that both will likely attempt to reap its benefits in case Hezbollah manages to survive the Israeli onslaught, which is, according to US analyst, William Lind, a victory in itself. Israel doesn't want to occupy Lebanon, but is keenly interested in destroying Hezbollah, thus sending a clear message to Iran that it is next. It also wants to broaden the Middle East conflict to force the US into an uninvited showdown with Iran and Syria. Expectedly, the US is providing 100 percent political, military and financial cover to Israel's adventurism in Lebanon, but will it go further? Hezbollah cannot lose if it wishes to survive as a formidable political force in Lebanon. If Hezbollah is disarmed, it is feared that Israel will go back to its full scale meddling in Lebanese affairs, isolating Syria even further, and gaining a strategic battle in its looming showdown with Tehran. Tragically, Israel's military adventurism and the US reprehensible backing of Israel's endless quest for regional domination has so far seen the death and wounding of thousands of innocent Lebanese civilians, and the destruction of a nation that has barely recovered from past Israeli wars, to once again collapse under the rubble of a new one. Ramzy Baroud is a U.S. journalist. He is the author of The Second Palestinian Uprising: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle, published by Pluto Press in London, available in the U.S. from the University of Michigan Press, and everywhere from Amazon.com. He is also the editor of PalestineChronicle.com. Bron: Al-jazeera
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:30
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:32
|
|||
|
|
Citaat:
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
Laatst gewijzigd op 30-07-2006 om 11:38. |
||
|
30-07-2006, 11:39
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:41
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:42
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
überhaupt, te zien aan zijn uitspraken is die journalist verre van objectief. Headlines in zijn eigen 'krant' gaan a la "The Root Causes, Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice" en "Assassinating the Peacekeepers". Lees anders het artikel van Ad Bloemendaal eens dat ik eerder postte, want van de Palestinian Chronicle worden we niet wijzer.
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:44
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:44
|
|
|
|
Overigens:
Israël bestookt huizen militanten in Gaza GAZA - Israëlische gevechtstoestellen hebben in de nacht van zaterdag op zondag twee huizen van militante Palestijnen ... in de Gazastrook onder vuur genomen. De bewoners van beide panden werden kort voor de aanvallen door het Israëlische leger gewaarschuwd en konden tijdig ontkomen. In een geval raakten door rondvliegend puin en glas twee buren gewond, meldden ooggetuigen. Een raket vernielde het huis van de leider van de Volksverzetscomités in Beit Hanun in het noorden van het Palestijnse gebied aan de Middellandse Zee. In het gebouw werden volgens Israël wapens opgeslagen. In het tweede geval vuurde de Israëlische luchtmacht een raket af op de woning van een lid van de militante islamitische groep Hamas in Gaza-stad. http://www.ad.nl/buitenland/article506106.ece (ANP) Zelfs als ergens wapens liggen en de hoofdbewoner een terroristische hotshot is worden de bewoners dus nog gewaarschuwd alvorens de zaak platgegooid wordt.
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:45
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:46
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:50
|
|||
|
|
Citaat:
Citaat:
 We hebben het hier over Gaza in dit artikel, niet over Libanon.
__________________
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child." - Dan Quayle
|
||
|
30-07-2006, 11:53
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
En niet gezien dat het Gaza was  Maar het blijft natuurlijk erg makkelijk om de mensen eerst te waarschuwen en ze dan toch maar aan te vallen. Dat rechtvaardigt totaal niet de aanvallen van ISrael.
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:54
|
||
|
Citaat:
Je mist de nodige achtergrondinformatie, waardoor gen redelijke discussie met je valt te voeren. Je zou je wat meer moeten inlezen over dit onderwerp. |
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:55
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:55
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:58
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
 Maar goed, daarnaast heeft Israel ook financiele hulp gehad, en dat weet jij ook. |
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:58
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 11:59
|
|
Verwijderd
|
Het "beste" leger ter wereld is weer eens op VN-ers aan het knallen, een flat met ruim 50 burgers is gedecimeerd.
Hoe lang valt nog vol te houden dat dit "recht op zelfverdediging" is? |
|
30-07-2006, 12:01
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:02
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:03
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:04
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:04
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:05
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:06
|
||
Verwijderd
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:09
|
||
|
|
Citaat:
__________________
"Mijn psychiater zegt dat ik schizofreen ben. Wij vinden van niet!"
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:11
|
||
Verwijderd
|
Citaat:
|
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:13
|
|
Verwijderd
|
Eigenlijk zijn die kinderen gewoon lui. Dat ze niet weggaan is een slappe lakse houding die niet te tolereren valt.
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:18
|
|
|
|
Waar gaat dit gelul nou over?
|
|
30-07-2006, 12:18
|
|
|
Wordt wel interessant, die blogpost die Gatara aanhaalde. Israel kan daar rustig het verdeel-en-heers spelletje van 1996 overdoen.
Dat Qana opnieuw de pineut is, dat is wel zielig, ik vernoemde het plaatsje 2 blz. terug.
__________________
J'ai vu l'orient dans son écrin, avec la lune pour bannière
|
| Advertentie |
|
|
 |
«
Vorige topic
|
Volgende topic
»
|
|
Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 06:04.
Adverteren